Failure to control the Umlazi River through infrastructural means and preparedness measures has resulted in Toyotas insurers seeking R6.5 billion in damages from the provincial government of KwaZulu-Natal, the eThekwini Municipality and Transnet.
This is according to independent development economist Glen Robbins, commenting after it emerged last week that Tokio Marine and Nichido Fire Insurance Co, the insurers of Toyota South Africa Motors TSAM, had filed a summons in the Durban High Court.
Craig Woolley, a director of Norton Rose Fulbright, has confirmed that the law firms client is seeking damages for payouts that TSAMs insurers had to make following devastating floods in April 2022.
Explaining why the insurers are litigating, Robbins said in an interview on Moneyweb that the Umlazis flow from the Midlands of KZN, especially in the event of a weather event, was supposed to be controlled and contained by a canal.
He said the canalisation of the Umlazi is a process started in 1946 and finished in the 1950s.
Effectively weve had a situation where theres sort of an engineered solution to reroute a river through to the ocean through the use of a canal system.
Robbins pointed out that the Umlazi bursting its banks in heavy downpours was nothing new.
He said it had been breached a number of times following severe floods after Cyclone Domoina and then a few times subsequently. Effectively the parties concerned all have some responsibility.
As for managing the canal and securing its infrastructural integrity, the municipality of eThekwini was the developer of the canal it is responsible for maintaining and looking after it, Robbins said.
Effectively, what the insurers are claiming is that there wasnt adequate maintenance of the canal itself, as well as the clearing of stormwater drains, of management of what they call berms which are basically flood defences that give additional capacity to prevent the canal overflowing or drainage channels overflowing.
Robbins told Jimmy Moyaha, presenter of the show, that about a third of the claim is for the sort of business losses from the plant closure that took a considerable period of time to reopen.
The rest relates to costs, the repairing of buildings, of infrastructure, replacement of machinery and equipment and the like.
Moneyweb reported that the exact figure of repairs and reinstatements alone had come to R4.49 billion.
Sign up to our mailing list and get daily news headlines and weekly features directly to your inbox free. Subscribe to receive print copies of Freight News Features to your door.